Comments on: Prosecuting Roger Clemens for Lying to Congress http://jeffreymiron.com/2010/08/prosecuting-roger-clemens-for-lying-to-congress/ Libertarianism A to Z Sun, 06 May 2012 22:53:22 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Tony61 http://jeffreymiron.com/2010/08/prosecuting-roger-clemens-for-lying-to-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-2104 Tony61 Sat, 04 Sep 2010 03:57:55 +0000 http://jeffreymiron.com/?p=1569#comment-2104 True, with a big but(t)... The libertarian view would state that employers should enforce their own restrictions on drug use. BUT, Clemons is not indicted for drug use, he lied to Congress and civil society needs to enforce that law. True, with a big but(t)…
The libertarian view would state that employers should enforce their own restrictions on drug use. BUT, Clemons is not indicted for drug use, he lied to Congress and civil society needs to enforce that law.

]]> By: Antoine http://jeffreymiron.com/2010/08/prosecuting-roger-clemens-for-lying-to-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-1893 Antoine Sat, 21 Aug 2010 12:38:27 +0000 http://jeffreymiron.com/?p=1569#comment-1893 Not true: For a professional player willing to improve his performance, and increase its visibility on the media market, there are thousands of children following their behavior. In Europe, it has terrible effects on 15 year old cycling amateur races for instance... And these children, they take the substances, damage their body irreversably, but never get the checks from any employer... This is a simple externality, isn't it? Not true:
For a professional player willing to improve his performance, and increase its visibility on the media market, there are thousands of children following their behavior. In Europe, it has terrible effects on 15 year old cycling amateur races for instance… And these children, they take the substances, damage their body irreversably, but never get the checks from any employer…

This is a simple externality, isn’t it?

]]> By: PP http://jeffreymiron.com/2010/08/prosecuting-roger-clemens-for-lying-to-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-1892 PP Sat, 21 Aug 2010 05:05:45 +0000 http://jeffreymiron.com/?p=1569#comment-1892 True. Then if there is demand for drug-free sports, let sports segregate to “open” and “no artificial hormones and antibiotics” leagues. Then in an effort to defend its reputation the “no artificial hormones” league can take measures to ensure that its athletes do not take performance enhancing substances and fire/eject from the league those who do. True. Then if there is demand for drug-free sports, let sports segregate to “open” and “no artificial hormones and antibiotics” leagues. Then in an effort to defend its reputation the “no artificial hormones” league can take measures to ensure that its athletes do not take performance enhancing substances and fire/eject from the league those who do.

]]>