<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The U.S. versus the G-20 on Spending</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeffreymiron.com/2010/06/the-u-s-versus-the-g-20-on-spending/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jeffreymiron.com/2010/06/the-u-s-versus-the-g-20-on-spending/</link>
	<description>Libertarianism A to Z</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 22:53:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stephen MacLean</title>
		<link>http://jeffreymiron.com/2010/06/the-u-s-versus-the-g-20-on-spending/comment-page-1/#comment-1533</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen MacLean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 16:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffreymiron.com/?p=1434#comment-1533</guid>
		<description>An excellent article, especially this paragraph:

&lt;blockquote&gt;These concerns about Keynesian spending are especially worrying because empirical support for the Keynesian model is far from compelling. The model implies that the impact of increased spending should be greater than the impact of tax cuts, but the existing evidence suggests more like the opposite. Indeed, some empirical evidence finds minimal impacts of spending, while most research finds a robust impact of tax cuts.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

May I also suggest two items by Steven Kates: this &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.iea.org.uk/?p=489&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;short overview&lt;/a&gt; of Keynesianism and a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/user/misesmedia#p/u/11/rIgkbdT5V6w&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;video&lt;/a&gt; arguing against the claims made for aggregate demand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An excellent article, especially this paragraph:</p>
<blockquote><p>These concerns about Keynesian spending are especially worrying because empirical support for the Keynesian model is far from compelling. The model implies that the impact of increased spending should be greater than the impact of tax cuts, but the existing evidence suggests more like the opposite. Indeed, some empirical evidence finds minimal impacts of spending, while most research finds a robust impact of tax cuts.</p></blockquote>
<p>May I also suggest two items by Steven Kates: this <a href="http://blog.iea.org.uk/?p=489" rel="nofollow">short overview</a> of Keynesianism and a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/misesmedia#p/u/11/rIgkbdT5V6w" rel="nofollow">video</a> arguing against the claims made for aggregate demand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

