<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cannabis Capitalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeffreymiron.com/2010/06/cannabis-capitalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jeffreymiron.com/2010/06/cannabis-capitalism/</link>
	<description>Libertarianism A to Z</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 22:53:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jesus von Mises</title>
		<link>http://jeffreymiron.com/2010/06/cannabis-capitalism/comment-page-1/#comment-1514</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesus von Mises</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 20:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffreymiron.com/?p=1428#comment-1514</guid>
		<description>Honestly, medicalization is a Solomonic, &quot;split the baby&quot; approach.

The median voter thinks that very sick people ought to have recourse to cannabis but &quot;mere&quot; pleasure-seekers shouldn&#039;t.

In truth, all this will do is delay the day when we decide whether cannabis should be legal or not.

In the meantime, there will be much diversion and grow-your-own.

This is the result of thoroughgoing consequentialism.

The budget benefits, such as they are, are not likely to come from increased tax revenue but (hopefully) from reduced enforcement costs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, medicalization is a Solomonic, &#8220;split the baby&#8221; approach.</p>
<p>The median voter thinks that very sick people ought to have recourse to cannabis but &#8220;mere&#8221; pleasure-seekers shouldn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>In truth, all this will do is delay the day when we decide whether cannabis should be legal or not.</p>
<p>In the meantime, there will be much diversion and grow-your-own.</p>
<p>This is the result of thoroughgoing consequentialism.</p>
<p>The budget benefits, such as they are, are not likely to come from increased tax revenue but (hopefully) from reduced enforcement costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

