Should Libertarians Accept Government Benefits?

by Jeffrey Miron on April 15th, 2010
17 CommentsComments

"No thanks - I'm a libertarian."

The cartoon raises an interesting question: should libertarians accepts benefits from government policies they oppose?

Should libertarians, for example, take the home-mortgage interest deduction, collect Social Security benefits, or work as vice cops?

It would be virtually impossible, of course, for a libertarian to avoid all government largesse. That would require, among other things, refusing to watch or even read about professional sports, since most stadiums receive government funding. 

But libertarians could, if they wished, reduce their receipt of government favors substantially. 

Should they? And where should they draw the line?

Thanks to my former student, Tom Lawless, for the pointing out the cartoon.

  • Share/Bookmark

Categories: My Blog

Comments

Feed
Trackback URL

  • David

    I think it’s fine to accept government benefits, but I wouldn’t encourage seeking them out beyond beyond things such as tax deductions (if we’re counting them as “benefits”). If libertarians have to worry and work at purposefully avoiding government benefits, that decreases the quality of our lives and essentially increases the burden of government on us in that we have to expend time and effort simply avoiding the government.


  • Dwatney

    If my house purchase actually goes through, I intend to get my $6500 tax credit. In doing so, I am keeping my own money, so I’m not losing sleep over it.


  • dfvazan

    There is nothing inherently wrong about benefiting from a policy you oppose. Despite all the rhetoric from the statists that the US tax rate is too low, I find it exceedingly doubtful that they will send the gov’t extra money this tax season to pay a higher and more “equitable” rate. Moreover, many of us have paid into and funded these programs, whether it is social security, medicare or the spending packages. If I could opt out and keep my confiscated income that supposedly helps maintain these “benefits,” I would. Until that becomes an option, there is nothing hypocritical about taking advantage of programs we are forced to invest in.


  • Cliff Nelson

    I bet most “libertarians” look for every loophole, opportunity and benefit offered by the gov’t while they work to enlighten people as to their beliefs.

    I don’t blame them either – you have are to adapt to the environment as it is – not live in some fantasy world which only you and your “group” subscribe to.


  • Christian

    I like Walter Block’s analysis of the issue. Consider, B steals from A, than C steals from B. The ideal situation is if the stolen property is returned to A. However, considering the alternatives, it is far preferable that C keep B’s ill gotten gains than that B be allowed to keep them.

    The whole thing along with a ton of other interesting thought on the proper libertarian interaction with an unjust government can be found in his paper – Radical Libertarianism: Applying Libertarian Principles
    to Dealing with the Unjust Government, here: http://www.walterblock.com/wp-content/uploads/publications/block_radical-libertarianism-rp.pdf.


  • AJs

    Absolutely we should take and accept every legal benefit/tax deduction/service available to us that we desire. Sports is a great example, you can oppose a rule – say 2 pt conversion – but if it is available and it is the smartest move at the time, you should take the conversion. That does not mean you are any less opposed to the rule, it means that you are smart enough to take every advantage to use the rule everyone else is being held to.

  • Irrespective of the other issues, not taking legal tax deductions is stupid. By taking them, you are simply reducing the amount of money the government would otherwise be taking from you. Assuming you view taxation as theft (which I do not), it would be the equivalent of locking up some of your possessions so the thief can only steal half of what you own rather than everything you own.


  • Tom Dougherty

    Let’s flip the argument. To those liberals and socialists who oppose markets and favor socialism, should they refuse to shop at privately owned businesses? Should they refuse to work for employers whom the means of production are owned by private individuals and not state owned? Should they refuse to use products produced by the private sector? If libertarian are to refuse the benefits of government then the statists should refuse the benefits of the market! Please flip the argument on those liberals and socialists who say libertarians are hypocrats.

  • I’d say Libertarians should do whatever they can to harm governements of the current kind.


  • AJs

    Great way to turn it around Tom!


  • Earl Swift

    I have had these thoughts with the individual mandate. I am a healthy, young adult who does not want to spend my money on health care, but the government says that I have to buy it. So this is very beneficial to me at the cost of everyone who pays the mandate (and all of those other taxes). The mandate will not be enforceable unless I have a refund. Sure I can pay the penalty, but the IRS cannot get the money from me like they can for normal income tax. My automatic withdrawals are lowered as much as I can, and now I can ride the pre-existing conditions train. I love how self-interest works, and hopes everyone will act on his or her self-interest until the government wakes up.


  • Earl Swift

    To go along with what Tom has said, liberals should volunteer to give up thier own extra money to the IRS, but they do not want to. They probably want to spend their money on their own choice of charity. It is funny how that works out.

  • I don’t think you can ever fault someone from acting in their own best interest, which may indeed involve accepting government handouts.


  • kingstu

    How else are we going to get our money back?


  • Mark

    Refusing to accept the benefits of government coercion that you have no choice in is like a rape victim refusing the rapist’s offer to use a condom.


  • Fiveweight

    I have thought about this situation many times while wondering why I don’t feel like a hypocrite myself. I came to the realization that you cannot expect anyone to do anything beyond what is rational in their own context. I do not believe we should expect people not to become addicted to life on welfare when it is so freely offered. It is not the fault of the illegal immigrant for pursuing a better life. It is the fault of the government for making such violations appealing and refusing to enforce limits. It is only rational to take what is offered, and while we may hope people would do what is right we can only expect people to do what is rational. Anything more is fooling ourselves.


  • canw

    Everyone is worried about jobs going overseas, but I think should they should be more optimistic. America is great for generating new jobs and dealing with change. My grandfather said railroads once lost a lot of business when electric companies switched from burning coal to nuclear power. Railroads also needed less workers when trains stopped using cabooses. Yet while some railroad jobs may have disappeared, new jobs like webpage designers and video store clerks have appeared. Horse buggy manufacturers became car manufacturers and typewriter companies now make computers. Many industries that were supposed to disappear like movie theatres due to VCR’s and accounting because of computers have never been stronger.

    While manufacturing jobs may go overseas to cheaper locations, the United States still manufactures more than any other country.

    http://investing.curiouscatblog.net/2009/10/13/data-on-the-largest-manufacturing-countries-in-2008/

    Even if more jobs go abroad, the USA will always have factories. I highly doubt that the United States will buy fighter jets from China. The price of labor may be cheaper in Asia now, but as oil and shipping prices rise, buying American products will not seem to be so expensive. Chinese products also have a reputation for poor quality and counterfeiting. BMW does not worry that Chinese car companies will steal their customers.

    Many jobs cannot be outsourced, either. You are not likely to call a doctor, lawyer, mechanic, mover, driver, barber, electrician, locksmith, real estate agent, or plumber in China to fix a problem you have in the USA. Are all the farms, mines, stores, hotels, museums, restaurants, churches, security guards, banks, government workers, schools, and athletes in the US going to be shipped overseas, too?

    Even if all the manufacturing jobs in the United States went to China, wouldn’t the Chinese need American skills? You could move there and teach English. Most of those container ships returning to Asia are EMPTY. Why not think of something the Chinese would like to buy? Americans are creative. Do you think China will be known as the new Disney and Hollywood? Will China become famous for apple pies, hamburgers, hot dogs, baseball, gun rights, democracy, free speech, and religious freedom?

    While change is sometimes scary and being cautious is good, hysteria is not. Think for yourself and don’t be a Chicken Little.

Leave Comment

Commenting Options

Alternatively, you can create an avatar that will appear whenever you leave a comment on a Gravatar-enabled blog.

Copyright 2010 Jeffrey Miron  |  Created by Brian D. Aitken
Entries (RSS)