<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free Speech at Public Universities?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeffreymiron.com/2010/04/free-speech-at-public-universities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jeffreymiron.com/2010/04/free-speech-at-public-universities/</link>
	<description>Libertarianism A to Z</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 22:53:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: zjnlymict</title>
		<link>http://jeffreymiron.com/2010/04/free-speech-at-public-universities/comment-page-1/#comment-3982</link>
		<dc:creator>zjnlymict</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 12:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffreymiron.com/?p=1043#comment-3982</guid>
		<description>B1f7B5  &lt;a href=&quot;http://qrkzqcauwkdi.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;qrkzqcauwkdi&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>B1f7B5  <a href="http://qrkzqcauwkdi.com/" rel="nofollow">qrkzqcauwkdi</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaycee</title>
		<link>http://jeffreymiron.com/2010/04/free-speech-at-public-universities/comment-page-1/#comment-3980</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaycee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffreymiron.com/?p=1043#comment-3980</guid>
		<description>What a neat atircle. I had no inkling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a neat atircle. I had no inkling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward</title>
		<link>http://jeffreymiron.com/2010/04/free-speech-at-public-universities/comment-page-1/#comment-839</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 05:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffreymiron.com/?p=1043#comment-839</guid>
		<description>http://tinyurl.com/y5dnrl5

A Supreme Court case is dealing with a Christian group at a law school that doesn&#039;t think they should be forced to include gays.

I&#039;m not sure why you need or are deserving of other people&#039;s money to have a Christian Bible study group at college. Do it with your own money if any is needed. Meet in either an unused classroom or a public area. That way, you have every right to exclude without the theatrical absurdity of politics.

I think the legal court case is pretty silly. In the article, the comments by Justice Scalia and Alito are poor and the ones by Justice Stephens and Sotomayor are even worse. I sometimes quote Robert Bork in criticizing the landmark Roe vs Wade decision by saying &quot;there was not a shred of legal reasoning&quot; in Justice Blackmun&#039;s majority opinion back in 1973. Likewise, where was the legal reasoning in anything those Justices said?

But what I really find interesting, whom I&#039;d really like to chastise is the Christians that excluded the gays. Are they gathering to worship the Jesus in the Bible? The Jesus that hung out with the most wicked, morally degenerate people he could find? Find me one time when Jesus turned someone down because they were sinners. Hypocrites! Maybe they should take the cross out of their eyes, stick this legal case up where the good Lord split them, and scrap this group think mentality so they can start to imitate their spiritual hero who loved everyone around him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/y5dnrl5" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/y5dnrl5</a></p>
<p>A Supreme Court case is dealing with a Christian group at a law school that doesn&#8217;t think they should be forced to include gays.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure why you need or are deserving of other people&#8217;s money to have a Christian Bible study group at college. Do it with your own money if any is needed. Meet in either an unused classroom or a public area. That way, you have every right to exclude without the theatrical absurdity of politics.</p>
<p>I think the legal court case is pretty silly. In the article, the comments by Justice Scalia and Alito are poor and the ones by Justice Stephens and Sotomayor are even worse. I sometimes quote Robert Bork in criticizing the landmark Roe vs Wade decision by saying &#8220;there was not a shred of legal reasoning&#8221; in Justice Blackmun&#8217;s majority opinion back in 1973. Likewise, where was the legal reasoning in anything those Justices said?</p>
<p>But what I really find interesting, whom I&#8217;d really like to chastise is the Christians that excluded the gays. Are they gathering to worship the Jesus in the Bible? The Jesus that hung out with the most wicked, morally degenerate people he could find? Find me one time when Jesus turned someone down because they were sinners. Hypocrites! Maybe they should take the cross out of their eyes, stick this legal case up where the good Lord split them, and scrap this group think mentality so they can start to imitate their spiritual hero who loved everyone around him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

